CGI is, in my view, one of the most important components to consider in the way of contemporary film-making. After all, it is able to bring life to special features that might not have that degree of life otherwise. There are so many ways in which it can be used, whether it is the creation of characters that cannot be seen in reality or bringing life to landscapes that are able to prove aesthetically pleasing. With that said, is it possible that CGI can be argued to be one of the most overused features in film?
CGI is definitely being used to tremendous extents, some examples of its application being better than others. To say the least, CGI is vital, not only in movies but television shows and other forms of visual media as well. For example, I am sure that just about everyone was captivated by the sight of Iron Man saving civilians by coming down from the sky in his third movie. It wasn't a time where we questioned the realism of CGI but rather enjoyed what we were seeing in front of us.
I liken CGI to almost like whipped cream atop an ice cream sundae, which makes sense. Whipped cream, while a special addition to the dessert itself, should not exactly be the focus of the dessert in question. When there is too much proverbial whipped cream as far as movies are concerned, that's when problems may arise. CGI has had many instances where it comes across as looking phony when it was not going for that effect. It wanted to immerse you but, for some reason or another, failed to do so.
As you can probably imagine, CGI can be used poorly and there are a few examples of this. The first "Twilight" film is a great example of this, as its visuals in terms of the CGI werewolves were not exactly the most convincing. While I understand that werewolves are not real and that no film can change that fact, the goal of special effects is to make you believe that what is being shown can be believed. Unfortunately, "Twilight" was a case of me having difficulty as far as suspending my disbelief was concerned.
Keep in mind that "Twilight" was not meant to be a movie that was aware of itself; otherwise poor CGI would have been excusable. However, this is an example of a studio not utilizing CGI in the way that others are able to. With so many different effects that can be incorporated, it's clear that there are some will come across more than others, depending on not only experience but the competency of the studios behind certain films. Perhaps one day the movie industry will reach a point where CGI will appear authentic across the board.
CGI is definitely being used to tremendous extents, some examples of its application being better than others. To say the least, CGI is vital, not only in movies but television shows and other forms of visual media as well. For example, I am sure that just about everyone was captivated by the sight of Iron Man saving civilians by coming down from the sky in his third movie. It wasn't a time where we questioned the realism of CGI but rather enjoyed what we were seeing in front of us.
I liken CGI to almost like whipped cream atop an ice cream sundae, which makes sense. Whipped cream, while a special addition to the dessert itself, should not exactly be the focus of the dessert in question. When there is too much proverbial whipped cream as far as movies are concerned, that's when problems may arise. CGI has had many instances where it comes across as looking phony when it was not going for that effect. It wanted to immerse you but, for some reason or another, failed to do so.
As you can probably imagine, CGI can be used poorly and there are a few examples of this. The first "Twilight" film is a great example of this, as its visuals in terms of the CGI werewolves were not exactly the most convincing. While I understand that werewolves are not real and that no film can change that fact, the goal of special effects is to make you believe that what is being shown can be believed. Unfortunately, "Twilight" was a case of me having difficulty as far as suspending my disbelief was concerned.
Keep in mind that "Twilight" was not meant to be a movie that was aware of itself; otherwise poor CGI would have been excusable. However, this is an example of a studio not utilizing CGI in the way that others are able to. With so many different effects that can be incorporated, it's clear that there are some will come across more than others, depending on not only experience but the competency of the studios behind certain films. Perhaps one day the movie industry will reach a point where CGI will appear authentic across the board.
About the Author:
If you are interested in movie design and other such fields, kindly look into art schools in Seattle for more information.. Also published at CGI & The Concern Of Over-Saturation.
0 nhận xét:
Post a Comment